linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 13th (drivers/mfd/lpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4c73795-de2c-f3f0-1cef-b5b7d08b3411@wedev4u.fr>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:15:41 +0200
From:   Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 13th (drivers/mfd/lpc_ich ->
 mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi-platform)

Hi all,

+ Arnd, who reported this issue too

Le 14/10/2017 à 02:31, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> On 10/13/17 14:06, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Changes since 20171012:
>>
>> The rdma tree gained a conflict.
> 
> 
> on i386:
> 
> CONFIG_PCI is not enabled.
> 
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c: In function 'lpc_ich_init_spi':
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1137:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_bus_write_config_byte' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus, p2sb, 0xe1, 0x0);
>    ^
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1138:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_bus_read_config_dword' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, spi, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0,
>    ^
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1147:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_bus_write_config_dword' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      pci_bus_write_config_dword(bus, spi, BCR, bcr);
>      ^
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c: At top level:
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1246:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default]
>  module_pci_driver(lpc_ich_driver);
>  ^
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1246:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'module_pci_driver' [-Werror=implicit-int]
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1246:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [enabled by default]
> ../drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1239:26: warning: 'lpc_ich_driver' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  static struct pci_driver lpc_ich_driver = {
>                           ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> ../scripts/Makefile.build:313: recipe for target 'drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.o' failed
> make[3]: *** [drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.o] Error 1
> 
> 
> But that driver depends on PCI, so it should not be built.
> This was caused by:
> 
> CONFIG_SPI_INTEL_SPI=y
> CONFIG_SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM=y
> 
> where the latter does this:
> 
> config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM
> 	tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash platform driver" if EXPERT
> 	depends on X86
> 	select SPI_INTEL_SPI
> 	select LPC_ICH
> 
> even though CONFIG_PCI is not enabled.  That's a no-no.
> 
> 

I've removed the faulty patch from the spi-nor/next branch of l2-mtd:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/805803/

Sorry for that!

Best regards,

Cyrille