[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c9a34a7-d865-b363-d899-348e06e6c113@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:28:13 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org, bp@...e.de,
poeschel@...onage.de, treding@...dia.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, andreas.noever@...il.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
jkosina@...e.cz, sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il, joe@...ches.com,
davem@...emloft.net, james.hogan@...tec.com,
michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kheitke@...ience.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 1/7] slimbus: Device management on SLIMbus
On 13/10/17 20:26, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:51:30PM +0200, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> SLIMbus (Serial Low Power Interchip Media Bus) is a specification
>> developed by MIPI (Mobile Industry Processor Interface) alliance.
>> SLIMbus is a 2-wire implementation, which is used to communicate with
>> peripheral components like audio-codec.
>> SLIMbus uses Time-Division-Multiplexing to accommodate multiple data
>> channels, and control channel. Control channel has messages to do
>> device-enumeration, messages to send/receive control-data to/from
>> slimbus devices, messages for port/channel management, and messages to
>> do bandwidth allocation.
>> The framework supports multiple instances of the bus (1 controller per
>> bus), and multiple slave devices per controller.
>>
>> This patch does device enumeration, logical address assignment,
>> informing device when the device reports present/absent etc.
>> Reporting present may need the driver to do the needful (e.g. turning
>> on voltage regulators powering the device). Additionally device is
>> probed when it reports present if that device doesn't need any such
>> steps mentioned above.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt | 57 ++
>
> Split to separate patch.
Will do this in next patch.
It was suggested by Arnd in v5, may be just of_parse code can be merged
in this patch and the bindings made as separate patch.
>
>> Documentation/slimbus/summary | 109 ++++
>> drivers/Kconfig | 2 +
>> drivers/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/slimbus/Kconfig | 11 +
>> drivers/slimbus/Makefile | 5 +
>> drivers/slimbus/slim-core.c | 695 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 13 +
>> include/linux/slimbus.h | 299 ++++++++++
>> 9 files changed, 1192 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/slimbus/summary
>> create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/slim-core.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/slimbus.h
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..cb658bb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/slimbus/bus.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
>> +SLIM(Serial Low Power Interchip Media Bus) bus
>> +
>> +SLIMbus is a 2-wire bus, and is used to communicate with peripheral
>> +components like audio-codec.
>> +
>> +Controller is a normal device using binding for whatever bus it is
>> +on (e.g. platform bus).
>
> I can't have a PCI based slimbus controller? "platform bus" is a
> Linuxism.
I agree, Will remove this Linuxism from the bindings.
>
>> +Required property for SLIMbus controller node:
>> +- compatible - name of SLIMbus controller following generic names
>> + recommended practice.
>
> generic names aren't recommended. Allowed with some conditons, yes.
>
>> +- #address-cells - should be 2
>
> You used 4 for your controller.
It should be actually 2. I will fix such mismatches in the other patches.
>
>> +- #size-cells - should be 0
>> +
>> +No other properties are required in the SLIMbus controller bus node.
>
> That's not a useful statement. Almost every controller probably has
> other required properties.
Yep, will get rid of this in next patch.
>
>> +
>> +Child nodes:
>> +Every SLIMbus controller node can contain zero or more child nodes
>> +representing slave devices on the bus. Every SLIMbus slave device is
>> +uniquely determined by the enumeration address containing 4 fields:
>> +Manufacturer ID, Product code, Device index, and Instance value for
>> +the device.
>> +If child node is not present and it is instantiated after device
>> +discovery (slave device reporting itself present).
>> +
>> +In some cases it may be necessary to describe non-probeable device
>> +details such as non-standard ways of powering up a device. In
>> +such cases, child nodes for those devices will be present as
>> +slaves of the slimbus-controller, as detailed below.
>> +
>> +Required property for SLIMbus child node if it is present:
>> +- reg - Is Duplex (Device index, Instance ID) from Enumeration
>> + Address.
>> + Device Index Uniquely identifies multiple Devices within
>> + a single Component.
>> + Instance ID Is for the cases where multiple Devices of the
>> + same type or Class are attached to the bus.
>> +
>> +- compatible -"slimMID,PID". The textual representation of Manufacturer ID,
>> + Product Code, shall be in lower case hexadecimal with leading
>> + zeroes suppressed
>> +
>> +SLIMbus example for Qualcomm's slimbus manager component:
>> +
>> + slim@...80000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,slim-msm";
>> + reg = <0x28080000 0x2000>,
>> + interrupts = <0 33 0>;
>> + clocks = <&lcc SLIMBUS_SRC>, <&lcc AUDIO_SLIMBUS_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "iface_clk", "core_clk";
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + codec: wcd9310@1{
>
> Is '1' by itself unique enough because you have 2 address cells. The
> unit-address is typically split up into fields with commas unless it's
> just a memory address. Anyway, you need to define the unit address
> format in this doc.
>
Yep, this examples should be fixed with proper unit address which is
formed by "device-id,instance-id"
device id + Instance ID makes it unique, I though I already added
details the reg property.
>> + compatible = "slim217,60"";
>> + reg = <1 0>;
>> + };
>> + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists