linux-kernel - Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171016093051.GB31858@krava>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:30:51 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 06:15:00PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> Sorry, missed you (but get_maintainer.pl doesn't list you). Here is ealier email.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/12/158
> 
> Do you think if this is a real issue?
> 
> btw, is their a dedicated mailist for perf? Thanks.

there's linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org for perf specific issues

jirka