[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tvyzs3wr.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:55:32 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stm class: make config_item_type const
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com> wrote:
>> This is a followup patch for:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/ and
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375
>>
>> Make config_item_type structures const as they are either passed to a
>> function having the argument as const or used inside a if statement or
>> stored in the const "ci_type" field of a config_item structure.
>>
>> Done using Coccinelle.
>>
>
> Tthis patch is dependent on the patches in the links
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375 and
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/. Therefore, this patch
> won't be correct unless the patches in these links gets applied.
So why not send it as a series then?
Regards,
--
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists