[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1918888.BSE68NRsHe@sbruens-linux>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:21:02 +0000
From: Brüns, Stefan <Stefan.Bruens@...h-aachen.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: "linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com" <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Code Kipper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] dmaengine: sun6i: Retrieve channel count/max
request from devicetree
On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 09:02:17 CEST Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:49:24AM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> > To avoid introduction of a new compatible for each small SoC/DMA
> > controller
> > variation, move the definition of the channel count to the devicetree.
> >
> > The number of vchans is no longer explicit, but limited by the highest
> > port/DMA request number. The result is a slight overallocation for SoCs
> > with a sparse port mapping.
>
> This doesnt apply for me, please check
The hunk below fails after https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/
vkoul/slave-dma.git/commit/?h=topic/
sun&id=8f3b00347bf075fb457f90ce76573615f567e7bc
, which removed the "const struct of_device_id *device;" declaration.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> index 7fce976a13d8..b5906da2a975 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
..
> @@ -1155,6 +1159,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun6i_dma_match);
> static int sun6i_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct of_device_id *device;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct sun6i_dma_dev *sdc;
> struct resource *res;
> int ret, i;
Can you fix this up, or should I send a new version of this patch?
Kind regards,
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists