[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171016160922.091796644@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:11:52 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mateusz S <muttdini@...il.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 01/19] ext4: in ext4_seek_{hole,data}, return -ENXIO for negative offsets
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
commit 1bd8d6cd3e413d64e543ec3e69ff43e75a1cf1ea upstream.
In the ext4 implementations of SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA, make sure we
return -ENXIO for negative offsets instead of banging around inside
the extent code and returning -EFSCORRUPTED.
Reported-by: Mateusz S <muttdini@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static loff_t ext4_seek_data(struct file
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
isize = i_size_read(inode);
- if (offset >= isize) {
+ if (offset < 0 || offset >= isize) {
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static loff_t ext4_seek_hole(struct file
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
isize = i_size_read(inode);
- if (offset >= isize) {
+ if (offset < 0 || offset >= isize) {
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists