[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871sm3n6sy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:51:57 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 14/14] Restartable sequences: Provide self-tests
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:
> Implements two basic tests of RSEQ functionality, and one more
> exhaustive parameterizable test.
>
> The first, "basic_test" only asserts that RSEQ works moderately
> correctly.
> E.g. that:
> - The CPUID pointer works
> - Code infinitely looping within a critical section will eventually be
> interrupted.
> - Critical sections are interrupted by signals.
>
> "basic_percpu_ops_test" is a slightly more "realistic" variant,
> implementing a few simple per-cpu operations and testing their
> correctness.
>
> "param_test" is a parametrizable restartable sequences test. See
> the "--help" output for usage.
Thanks for providing selftests :)
The Makefiles could use a little clean up:
- cpu-opv doesn't need libpthread
- you don't need to define your own rule just for building
- use TEST_GEN_PROGS to hook into the right parts of lib.mk
- .. which means you can use the clean rule in lib.mk
I notice you didn't add rseq or cpu-opv to the list of TARGETS in
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile, was that deliberate?
Feel free to squash this patch in if you're happy to.
This still works with:
$ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=rseq
and:
$ cd tools/testing/selftests/rseq; make
cheers
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-opv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-opv/Makefile
index 81d0596824ee..d41670ad5c43 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-opv/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-opv/Makefile
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
CFLAGS += -O2 -Wall -g -I./ -I../../../../usr/include/
-LDFLAGS += -lpthread
-TESTS = basic_cpu_opv_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS = basic_cpu_opv_test
-all: $(TESTS)
-%: %.c cpu-op.c cpu-op.h
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LDFLAGS)
+all: $(TEST_GEN_PROGS)
-include ../lib.mk
+$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): cpu-op.c cpu-op.h
-clean:
- $(RM) $(TESTS)
+include ../lib.mk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
index 7f0153556b80..9f8257b4ce14 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
CFLAGS += -O2 -Wall -g -I./ -I../cpu-opv/ -I../../../../usr/include/
-LDFLAGS += -lpthread
+LDLIBS += -lpthread
-TESTS = basic_test basic_percpu_ops_test param_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS = basic_test basic_percpu_ops_test param_test
-all: $(TESTS)
-%: %.c rseq.h rseq-*.h rseq.c ../cpu-opv/cpu-op.c ../cpu-opv/cpu-op.h
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LDFLAGS)
+all: $(TEST_GEN_PROGS)
-include ../lib.mk
+$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): rseq.h rseq-*.h rseq.c ../cpu-opv/cpu-op.c ../cpu-opv/cpu-op.h
-clean:
- $(RM) $(TESTS)
+include ../lib.mk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists