linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 51/53] x86/microcode: Do the family check first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171016161444.379414406@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:16:48 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 51/53] x86/microcode: Do the family check first

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

commit 1f161f67a272cc4f29f27934dd3f74cb657eb5c4 upstream.

On CPUs like AMD's Geode, for example, we shouldn't even try to load
microcode because they do not support the modern microcode loading
interface.

However, we do the family check *after* the other checks whether the
loader has been disabled on the command line or whether we're running in
a guest.

So move the family checks first in order to exit early if we're being
loaded on an unsupported family.

Reported-and-tested-by: Sven Glodowski <glodi1@...or.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061396
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012112316.977-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -122,9 +122,6 @@ static bool __init check_loader_disabled
 	bool *res = &dis_ucode_ldr;
 #endif
 
-	if (!have_cpuid_p())
-		return *res;
-
 	/*
 	 * CPUID(1).ECX[31]: reserved for hypervisor use. This is still not
 	 * completely accurate as xen pv guests don't see that CPUID bit set but
@@ -166,24 +163,36 @@ bool get_builtin_firmware(struct cpio_da
 void __init load_ucode_bsp(void)
 {
 	unsigned int cpuid_1_eax;
+	bool intel = true;
 
-	if (check_loader_disabled_bsp())
+	if (!have_cpuid_p())
 		return;
 
 	cpuid_1_eax = native_cpuid_eax(1);
 
 	switch (x86_cpuid_vendor()) {
 	case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
-		if (x86_family(cpuid_1_eax) >= 6)
-			load_ucode_intel_bsp();
+		if (x86_family(cpuid_1_eax) < 6)
+			return;
 		break;
+
 	case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
-		if (x86_family(cpuid_1_eax) >= 0x10)
-			load_ucode_amd_bsp(cpuid_1_eax);
+		if (x86_family(cpuid_1_eax) < 0x10)
+			return;
+		intel = false;
 		break;
+
 	default:
-		break;
+		return;
 	}
+
+	if (check_loader_disabled_bsp())
+		return;
+
+	if (intel)
+		load_ucode_intel_bsp();
+	else
+		load_ucode_amd_bsp(cpuid_1_eax);
 }
 
 static bool check_loader_disabled_ap(void)