linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for mss remoteproc on msm8996

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:58:04 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     "Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)" <akdwived@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     sboyd@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for mss remoteproc
 on msm8996

On Mon 16 Oct 06:19 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 11:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > Please fix this and add my Acked-by
> Sure will do, just want to ask, when i am sending updated patches, should i
> sent all the 4 patches in series or should skip those which are acked by
> you.

Please include all the patches in each submission (unless the maintainer
tells you that he/she applied some of them already).

Make sure to add any "Acked-by", "Reviewed-by" and "Tested-by" on your
patches, so that people know that they are already reviewed/tested.

And finally, when resending patches, add a section between "---" and the
diff-stat describing changes since the last version - that makes it
easier to see what changed since last time and will help the reviewer
look at the "new" things.

Thanks,
Bjorn