[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59E50473.7040609@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:11:47 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Remove dead variable
On 10/16/2017 08:59 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 20:54:36 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
>> On 10/16/2017 08:18 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> task is never used in bpf_get_current_uid_gid(), kill it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
>>> index e8845adcd15e..511c9d522cfc 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
>>> @@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto
>>> bpf_get_current_pid_tgid_proto = {>
>>> BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_uid_gid)
>>> {
>>>
>>> - struct task_struct *task = current;
>>>
>>> kuid_t uid;
>>> kgid_t gid;
>>
>> Needs to be squashed into patch 1/3?
>
> I can squash it into 1/3, I kept it that way because
> even without 1/3 this variable is unused.
Hmm, the helper looks like the below. In patch 1/3 you removed
the 'if (unlikely(!task))' test where the variable was used before,
so 2/3 without the 1/3 would result in a compile error.
BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_uid_gid)
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
kuid_t uid;
kgid_t gid;
if (unlikely(!task))
return -EINVAL;
current_uid_gid(&uid, &gid);
return (u64) from_kgid(&init_user_ns, gid) << 32 |
from_kuid(&init_user_ns, uid);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists