[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171016160125.2a927a83@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:01:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: bpf: Hide bpf trace events when they are not
used
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:54:34 +0100 (WEST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Steven, I lost track of how this patch is being handled.
>
> Do you want me to merge it via my net-next tree?
If you want. I could take it too if you give me an ack. It's not
dependent on any other changes so it doesn't matter which way it goes. I
know Alexei was thinking about doing the same for xdp but those appear
to be used even without BPF_SYSCALLS.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists