lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:48:37 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        "Gabriel M. Elder" <gabriel@...gnowsys.com>,
        Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
        Mario.Limonciello@...l.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell-laptop: Fix keyboard led max_brightness property
 for Dell Latitude E6410

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:03:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This machine reports number of keyboard backlight led levels, instead of
> value of the last led level index. Therefore max_brightness properly needs
> to be subtracted by 1 to match led max_brightness API.

Which field is behaving differently?

If I'm understanding this correctly:

Since the max level is something we test for once at runtime, it seems
to me a cleaner fix would be to check for this quirk in kbd_get_info()
and set kbd_info.levels accordingly. The rest of the driver logic would
then remain unchanged.

The idea being to translate what the platform firmware reports into what
the driver already understands, instead of giving the levels fields of
the structure multiple meanings.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ