[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171016215316.GA12885@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:16 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: ipx: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
net/ipx/af_ipx.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipx/af_ipx.c b/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
index ac598ec..d21a9d1 100644
--- a/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
+++ b/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
@@ -1867,6 +1867,7 @@ static int ipx_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
rc = -EPERM;
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
break;
+ /* fall through */
case SIOCGIFADDR:
rc = ipxitf_ioctl(cmd, argp);
break;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists