[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171017185206.dquho5wtr5f6pwmv@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:52:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: more build problems with "Makefile: move stackprotector
availability out of Kconfig"
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:47:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> To clarify: with my gcc-4.9/gcc-5 build, -mstack-protector-guard=tls
> has no effect,
> the output is the same as with -mstack-protector-guard=global using the Ubuntu
> compilers of the same version.
Jumping in here... on IRC Arnd suggested reverting 123c48cf899d
("Makefile: introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO") from -next. What
do you think Kees?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists