[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171017125645.3f8f6c4516fc641bbf94ed09@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:56:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: more build problems with
"Makefile: move stackprotector availability out of Kconfig"
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:53:10 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:47:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> To clarify: with my gcc-4.9/gcc-5 build, -mstack-protector-guard=tls
> >> has no effect,
> >> the output is the same as with -mstack-protector-guard=global using the Ubuntu
> >> compilers of the same version.
> >
> > Jumping in here... on IRC Arnd suggested reverting 123c48cf899d
> > ("Makefile: introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO") from -next. What
> > do you think Kees?
>
> Until we sort this out, yes, agreed. Andrew, can you pull the patches?
Sure. All these?
sh-boot-add-static-stack-protector-to-pre-kernel.patch
makefile-move-stackprotector-availability-out-of-kconfig.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-2.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-3.patch
Mark, can you please drop those from -next also?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists