[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171017214732.f3iaw2mgue2kfbf6@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:47:32 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:43:14PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> + {
> >> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
> >> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> >> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
> >> + },
> >
> > checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
> > since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
> > DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
> > resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
> > already.
>
> It is used by arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts.
Thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists