[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171017083027.fdzk3ujcgted3q5g@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:30:27 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the
drm-intel-fixes tree
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:11:53AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This merge seems fine, but it seems there was another merge
> against the akpm tree that introduced a build error by reintroducing
> the spin_lock_irqsave() without restoring the local variable:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function 'nop_submit_request':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:3092:54: error: 'flags' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'?
> I'll send my local build fix, which may or may not be the intended
> behavior but gets it to compile.
Bother, that was actually an automated merge git did.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists