[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171017092259.GA21398@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:23:00 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: "chengjian (D)" <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, oleg@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Xiexiuqi (Xie XiuQi)" <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: A issue about ptrace/SINGLESTEP on arm64
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:04:00AM +0800, chengjian (D) wrote:
> On 2017/10/16 23:30, Will Deacon wrote:
> >Can you jump the PC once the child appears to be "stuck"?
> >
> >IIRC, GDB has special heuristics to step through LDXR/STXR critical
> >sections.
> The function can be returned, But the number of instructions looks too much
> We use objdump to count the assembly code length of the program
>
> #=======
> #trace
> #=======
> ptrace/2-arm64-loop # objdump -d ./nop | wc -l
> 115885
>
>
> ptrace/2-arm64-loop # ./ptrace_singlestep ./nop
>
> ./nop : nop
> Please wait
> Number of machine instructions : 186688022
>
>
> /ptrace/2-arm64-loop # ./ptrace_singlestep ./nop
>
> ./nop : nop
> Please wait
> Number of machine instructions : 103670668
>
>
> The number of instructions executed twice is not the same
What is "nop"? What does perf stat say? Does is "ptrace_singlestep"
reporting the number of instructions? Is it a periodic dump, or does it
actually wait for program termination?
> #=======
> #trace ls
> #=======
>
> ptrace/2-arm64-loop # objdump -d /bin/ls | wc -l
> 18095
>
> ptrace/2-arm64-loop # ./ptrace_singlestep /bin/ls
> /bin/ls : ls
> Please wait
> Number of machine instructions : 7718122167
I don't really know where to start here. The dynamic execution of a binary
includes branches, loops, libraries etc so of course the dynamic instruction
count is different to the static count of the binary.
> It seems that the child has also been tracked by the parent process
> when it goes into the kernel space.
Ptrace single-step shouldn't step into the kernel.
> Is this what your 'stuck' mean?
> Does all the instructions been tracked in kernel space, or only the
> LDXR/STXR?
Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking here.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists