[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171017003329.GC19504@leoy-ThinkPad-T440>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:33:29 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: ARM64: Regression with commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic
VMAP_STACK support")
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:48:19PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:17:23AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:03:44PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 10/10/17 16:45, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:27:25PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > >> I work mainline kernel on Hikey620 board, I find it's easily to
> > > >> introduce the panic and report the log as below. So I bisect the kernel
> > > >> and finally narrow down the commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic
> > > >> VMAP_STACK support") which introduce this issue.
> > > >>
> > > >> I tried to remove 'select HAVE_ARCH_VMAP_STACK' from
> > > >> arch/arm64/Kconfig, then I can see the panic issue will dismiss. So
> > > >> could you check this and have insight for this issue?
> > > >
> > > > Given the stuff in the backtrace, my suspicion is something is trying to
> > > > perform DMA to/from the stack, getting junk addresses form the attempted
> > > > virt<->phys conversions.
> > > >
> > > > Could you try enabling both VMAP_STACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL?
> > >
> > > CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG should scream about drivers trying to use stack
> > > addresses either way, too.
> >
> > Thanks for suggestions, Mark & Robin.
> >
> > I enabled these debugging configs but cannot get clue from it; but
> > occasionally found this issue is quite likely related with CA53 errata,
> > especialy ERRATA_A53_855873 is the relative one. So I changed to use
> > ARM-TF mainline code with ERRATA fixing, this issue can be dismissed.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Just to confirm, with the updated firmware you no longer see the issue?
Yes.
> I can't immediately see how that would be related.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists