lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-+yOyAC4R_JNNy7NqWiSQ=HwfR=uTr1Ntt=2cDzAZ5nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:52:44 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     "Liuwenliang (Lamb)" <liuwenliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        "kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "aryabinin@...tuozzo.com" <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        "afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com" <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "cdall@...aro.org" <cdall@...aro.org>,
        "marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "mawilcox@...rosoft.com" <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "thgarnie@...gle.com" <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "vladimir.murzin@....com" <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
        "tixy@...aro.org" <tixy@...aro.org>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "grygorii.strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
        "glider@...gle.com" <glider@...gle.com>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "opendmb@...il.com" <opendmb@...il.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Jiazhenghua <jiazhenghua@...wei.com>,
        Dailei <dylix.dailei@...wei.com>,
        Zengweilin <zengweilin@...wei.com>,
        Heshaoliang <heshaoliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] Define the virtual space of KASan's shadow region

On 17 October 2017 at 12:27, Liuwenliang (Lamb) <liuwenliang@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 12:40 AM, Abbott Liu wrote:
>> Ard Biesheuvel [ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org] wrote
>>This is unnecessary:
>>
>>ldr r1, =TASK_SIZE
>>
>>will be converted to a mov instruction by the assembler if the value of TASK_SIZE fits its 12-bit immediate field.
>>
>>So please remove the whole #ifdef, and just use ldr r1, =xxx
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> The assembler on my computer don't convert ldr r1,=xxx into mov instruction.


What I said was

'if the value of TASK_SIZE fits its 12-bit immediate field'

and your value of TASK_SIZE is 0xb6e00000, which cannot be decomposed
in the right way.

If you build with KASAN disabled, it will generate a mov instruction instead.



> Here is the objdump for vmlinux:
>
> c0a3b100 <__irq_svc>:
> c0a3b100:       e24dd04c        sub     sp, sp, #76     ; 0x4c
> c0a3b104:       e31d0004        tst     sp, #4
> c0a3b108:       024dd004        subeq   sp, sp, #4
> c0a3b10c:       e88d1ffe        stm     sp, {r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, fp, ip}
> c0a3b110:       e8900038        ldm     r0, {r3, r4, r5}
> c0a3b114:       e28d7030        add     r7, sp, #48     ; 0x30
> c0a3b118:       e3e06000        mvn     r6, #0
> c0a3b11c:       e28d204c        add     r2, sp, #76     ; 0x4c
> c0a3b120:       02822004        addeq   r2, r2, #4
> c0a3b124:       e52d3004        push    {r3}            ; (str r3, [sp, #-4]!)
> c0a3b128:       e1a0300e        mov     r3, lr
> c0a3b12c:       e887007c        stm     r7, {r2, r3, r4, r5, r6}
> c0a3b130:       e1a0972d        lsr     r9, sp, #14
> c0a3b134:       e1a09709        lsl     r9, r9, #14
> c0a3b138:       e5990008        ldr     r0, [r9, #8]
> ---c0a3b13c:       e59f1054        ldr     r1, [pc, #84]   ; c0a3b198 <__irq_svc+0x98>  //ldr r1, =TASK_SIZE
> c0a3b140:       e5891008        str     r1, [r9, #8]
> c0a3b144:       e58d004c        str     r0, [sp, #76]   ; 0x4c
> c0a3b148:       ee130f10        mrc     15, 0, r0, cr3, cr0, {0}
> c0a3b14c:       e58d0048        str     r0, [sp, #72]   ; 0x48
> c0a3b150:       e3a00051        mov     r0, #81 ; 0x51
> c0a3b154:       ee030f10        mcr     15, 0, r0, cr3, cr0, {0}
> ---c0a3b158:       e59f103c        ldr     r1, [pc, #60]   ; c0a3b19c <__irq_svc+0x9c>  //orginal irq_svc also used same instruction
> c0a3b15c:       e1a0000d        mov     r0, sp
> c0a3b160:       e28fe000        add     lr, pc, #0
> c0a3b164:       e591f000        ldr     pc, [r1]
> c0a3b168:       e5998004        ldr     r8, [r9, #4]
> c0a3b16c:       e5990000        ldr     r0, [r9]
> c0a3b170:       e3380000        teq     r8, #0
> c0a3b174:       13a00000        movne   r0, #0
> c0a3b178:       e3100002        tst     r0, #2
> c0a3b17c:       1b000007        blne    c0a3b1a0 <svc_preempt>
> c0a3b180:       e59d104c        ldr     r1, [sp, #76]   ; 0x4c
> c0a3b184:       e59d0048        ldr     r0, [sp, #72]   ; 0x48
> c0a3b188:       ee030f10        mcr     15, 0, r0, cr3, cr0, {0}
> c0a3b18c:       e5891008        str     r1, [r9, #8]
> c0a3b190:       e16ff005        msr     SPSR_fsxc, r5
> c0a3b194:       e8ddffff        ldm     sp, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, fp, ip, sp, lr, pc}^
> ---c0a3b198:       b6e00000        .word   0xb6e00000   //TASK_SIZE:0xb6e00000
> c0a3b19c:       c0ccccf0        .word   0xc0ccccf0
>
>
>
> Even "ldr r1, =TASK_SIZE"  won't be converted to a mov instruction by some assembler, I also think it is better
> to remove the whole #ifdef because the influence of performance by ldr is very limited.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ