linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/panel: simple: add a macro for defining display modes in a simpler and less error prone way

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171017141337.088ba796@karo-electronics.de>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:13:37 +0200
From:   Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/panel: simple: add a macro for defining display
 modes in a simpler and less error prone way

Hi,

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:08:18 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:33PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Create a macro that eases the definition of display mode parameters by
> > accecpting the parameters:
> > freq, hactive, hfront-porch, hsynclen, hback-porch,
> > vactive, vfront-porch, vsynclen, vback-porch, vrefresh
> > that can be usually directly taken from an LCD datasheet.
> > 
> > Put the calculations that are now open coded repeating the same
> > parameters multiple times into the macro expansion.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > index 474fa75..dec639d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > @@ -411,6 +411,20 @@ static const struct panel_desc ampire_am_480272h3tmqw_t01h = {
> >  	.bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
> >  };
> >  
> > +#define SP_DISPLAY_MODE(freq, ha, hfp, hs, hbp, va, vfp, vs, vbp, vr, flgs) { \
> > +	.clock = freq,							\
> > +	.hdisplay = ha,							\
> > +	.hsync_start = (ha) + (hfp),					\
> > +	.hsync_end = (ha) + (hfp) + (hs),				\
> > +	.htotal = (ha) + (hfp) + (hs) + (hbp),				\
> > +	.vdisplay = (va),						\
> > +	.vsync_start = (va) + (vfp),					\
> > +	.vsync_end = (va) + (vfp) + (vs),				\
> > +	.vtotal = (va) + (vfp) + (vs) + (vbp),				\
> > +	.vrefresh = vr,							\
> > +	.flags = flgs,							\
> > +	}
> 
> I don't think this simplifies anything. It's now completely non-obvious
> which parameter is which, so you actually have to go look at the macro
> definition when you add a new mode to make sure you get them right.
> 
In the original code you have to repeat the same parameters (e.g.
vertical front porch (vfp)) in multiple places which is error prone.


Lothar Waßmann