linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/19] 3.18.76-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171017132237.GB25495@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:22:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/19] 3.18.76-stable review

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:20:30PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 39 boots: 3 failed, 36 passed (v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: linux-3.18.y
> Git Describe: v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429
> Git Commit: 4ffe55402429b1be08b48d02b7be9371148c68b6
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 12 unique boards, 6 SoC families, 10 builds out of 182
> 
> Boot Failures Detected:
> 
> arm:
> 
>     omap2plus_defconfig
>         am335x-boneblack: 1 failed lab
> 
>     exynos_defconfig
>         exynos5800-peach-pi: 1 failed lab
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig
>         imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab

Thanks for all of the reports.  They all look good except this for 3.18.
Is this to be expected?

thanks,

greg k-h