[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1916073216.42952.1508248235963.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 14/14] Restartable sequences: Provide
self-tests
----- On Oct 17, 2017, at 6:38 AM, Michael Ellerman mpe@...erman.id.au wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:
>
>> ----- On Oct 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Michael Ellerman mpe@...erman.id.au wrote:
>>
>>> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Implements two basic tests of RSEQ functionality, and one more
>>>> exhaustive parameterizable test.
>>>>
>>>> The first, "basic_test" only asserts that RSEQ works moderately
>>>> correctly.
>>>> E.g. that:
>>>> - The CPUID pointer works
>>>> - Code infinitely looping within a critical section will eventually be
>>>> interrupted.
>>>> - Critical sections are interrupted by signals.
>>>>
>>>> "basic_percpu_ops_test" is a slightly more "realistic" variant,
>>>> implementing a few simple per-cpu operations and testing their
>>>> correctness.
>>>>
>>>> "param_test" is a parametrizable restartable sequences test. See
>>>> the "--help" output for usage.
>>>
>>> Thanks for providing selftests :)
>>>
>>> The Makefiles could use a little clean up:
>>> - cpu-opv doesn't need libpthread
>>> - you don't need to define your own rule just for building
>>> - use TEST_GEN_PROGS to hook into the right parts of lib.mk
>>> - .. which means you can use the clean rule in lib.mk
>>>
>>>
>>> I notice you didn't add rseq or cpu-opv to the list of TARGETS in
>>> tools/testing/selftests/Makefile, was that deliberate?
>>
>> No, I think I just copied some other selftest which perhaps did
>> not have those rules back then.
>
> OK. I don't see why these tests shouldn't be part of the default test
> run, so here's a patch to add them.
Perfect, folded that change into my series as well.
Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> cheers
>
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> index ff805643b5f7..b79ef5915c74 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ TARGETS += breakpoints
> TARGETS += capabilities
> TARGETS += cpufreq
> TARGETS += cpu-hotplug
> +TARGETS += cpu-opv
> TARGETS += efivarfs
> TARGETS += exec
> TARGETS += firmware
> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ TARGETS += nsfs
> TARGETS += powerpc
> TARGETS += pstore
> TARGETS += ptrace
> +TARGETS += rseq
> TARGETS += seccomp
> TARGETS += sigaltstack
> TARGETS += size
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists