linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Winbond w25q16dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:03:48 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:     cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr, marek.vasut@...il.com
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Winbond w25q16dw

On 28/08/2017 15:11, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add JEDEC entry for the Winbond w25q16fw/w25q16dw with similar
> flags and format than the Winbond w25q32dw entry.
> 
> Tested on a Khadas VIM2 SBC board with an Amlogic S912 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index cf1d4a1..2f74583 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -1137,6 +1137,11 @@ static int spi_nor_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>  	{ "w25x40", INFO(0xef3013, 0, 64 * 1024,  8,  SECT_4K) },
>  	{ "w25x80", INFO(0xef3014, 0, 64 * 1024,  16, SECT_4K) },
>  	{ "w25x16", INFO(0xef3015, 0, 64 * 1024,  32, SECT_4K) },
> +	{
> +		"w25q16dw", INFO(0xef6015, 0, 64 * 1024,  32,
> +			SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
> +			SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB)
> +	},
>  	{ "w25x32", INFO(0xef3016, 0, 64 * 1024,  64, SECT_4K) },
>  	{ "w25q20cl", INFO(0xef4012, 0, 64 * 1024,  4, SECT_4K) },
>  	{ "w25q20bw", INFO(0xef5012, 0, 64 * 1024,  4, SECT_4K) },
> 

Hi Cyrille,

Did you had time to review this patch ?

Thanks,
Neil