linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] block/aoe: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:09:25 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ed L. Cashin" <ed.cashin@....org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block/aoe: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On 10/16/2017 06:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 05:13 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>
>> Applied to for-4.15/timer
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just wanted to check what your timer plans were for merging this
> into -next (I'm doing rebasing to find out which maintainers I need to
> resend patches to, and I noticed block hasn't appeared in -next, but I
> know you've pulled patches...)

It should be in for-next, since I wrote that email. It's in my
for-4.15/timer branch, which is also merged into my for-next branch
(which is the one that Stephen pulls).

-- 
Jens Axboe