| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UfeDJomnen_2PhgnHSi27YROjTAtT=OYEj0JNVD8fzcOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:33:33 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Filip Sadowski <filip.sadowski@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] [v2] i40e: avoid 64-bit division where possible
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> The new bandwidth calculation caused a link error on 32-bit
> architectures, like
>
> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.ko] undefined!
>
> The problem is the max_tx_rate calculation that uses 64-bit integers.
> This is not really necessary since the numbers are in MBit/s so
> they won't be higher than 40000 for the highest support rate, and
> are guaranteed to not exceed 2^32 in future generations either.
>
> Another patch from Alan Brady fixed the link error by adding
> many calls to do_div(), which makes the code less efficent and
> less readable than necessary.
>
> This changes the representation to 'u32' when dealing with MBit/s
> and uses div_u64() to convert from u64 numbers in byte/s, reverting
> parts of Alan's earlier fix that have become obsolete now.
>
> Fixes: 2027d4deacb1 ("i40e: Add support setting TC max bandwidth rates")
> Fixes: 73983b5ae011 ("i40e: fix u64 division usage")
> Cc: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
So this patch looks good to me, we just need to test it to verify it
doesn't break existing functionality. In the meantime if Alan's patch
has gone through testing we should probably push "i40e: fix u64
division usage" to Dave so that we can at least fix the linking issues
on ARM and i386.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 4 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 70 +++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> index c3f13120f3ce..c7aa0c982273 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ struct i40e_channel {
> u8 enabled_tc;
> struct i40e_aqc_vsi_properties_data info;
>
> - u64 max_tx_rate;
> + u32 max_tx_rate; /* in Mbits/s */
>
> /* track this channel belongs to which VSI */
> struct i40e_vsi *parent_vsi;
> @@ -1101,5 +1101,5 @@ static inline bool i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> }
>
> int i40e_create_queue_channel(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, struct i40e_channel *ch);
> -int i40e_set_bw_limit(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 seid, u64 max_tx_rate);
> +int i40e_set_bw_limit(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 seid, u32 max_tx_rate);
> #endif /* _I40E_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> index 3ceda140170d..57682cc78508 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> @@ -5448,17 +5448,16 @@ int i40e_get_link_speed(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> *
> * Helper function to set BW limit for a given VSI
> **/
> -int i40e_set_bw_limit(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 seid, u64 max_tx_rate)
> +int i40e_set_bw_limit(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 seid, u32 max_tx_rate)
> {
> struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
> - u64 credits = 0;
> int speed = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> speed = i40e_get_link_speed(vsi);
> if (max_tx_rate > speed) {
> dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev,
> - "Invalid max tx rate %llu specified for VSI seid %d.",
> + "Invalid max tx rate %u specified for VSI seid %d.",
> max_tx_rate, seid);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -5469,13 +5468,12 @@ int i40e_set_bw_limit(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 seid, u64 max_tx_rate)
> }
>
> /* Tx rate credits are in values of 50Mbps, 0 is disabled */
> - credits = max_tx_rate;
> - do_div(credits, I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> - ret = i40e_aq_config_vsi_bw_limit(&pf->hw, seid, credits,
> + ret = i40e_aq_config_vsi_bw_limit(&pf->hw, seid,
> + max_tx_rate / I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR,
> I40E_MAX_BW_INACTIVE_ACCUM, NULL);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev,
> - "Failed set tx rate (%llu Mbps) for vsi->seid %u, err %s aq_err %s\n",
> + "Failed set tx rate (%u Mbps) for vsi->seid %u, err %s aq_err %s\n",
> max_tx_rate, seid, i40e_stat_str(&pf->hw, ret),
> i40e_aq_str(&pf->hw, pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status));
> return ret;
> @@ -6158,17 +6156,13 @@ int i40e_create_queue_channel(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
>
> /* configure VSI for BW limit */
> if (ch->max_tx_rate) {
> - u64 credits = ch->max_tx_rate;
> -
> if (i40e_set_bw_limit(vsi, ch->seid, ch->max_tx_rate))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - do_div(credits, I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> dev_dbg(&pf->pdev->dev,
> - "Set tx rate of %llu Mbps (count of 50Mbps %llu) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> + "Set tx rate of %u Mbps (count of 50Mbps %u) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> ch->max_tx_rate,
> - credits,
> - ch->seid);
> + ch->max_tx_rate / I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR, ch->seid);
> }
>
> /* in case of VF, this will be main SRIOV VSI */
> @@ -6189,7 +6183,6 @@ int i40e_create_queue_channel(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> static int i40e_configure_queue_channels(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> {
> struct i40e_channel *ch;
> - u64 max_rate = 0;
> int ret = 0, i;
>
> /* Create app vsi with the TCs. Main VSI with TC0 is already set up */
> @@ -6211,9 +6204,8 @@ static int i40e_configure_queue_channels(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> /* Bandwidth limit through tc interface is in bytes/s,
> * change to Mbit/s
> */
> - max_rate = vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[i];
> - do_div(max_rate, I40E_BW_MBPS_DIVISOR);
> - ch->max_tx_rate = max_rate;
> + ch->max_tx_rate = div_u64(vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[i],
> + I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
>
> list_add_tail(&ch->list, &vsi->ch_list);
>
> @@ -6643,7 +6635,6 @@ static int i40e_validate_mqprio_qopt(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio_qopt)
> {
> u64 sum_max_rate = 0;
> - u64 max_rate = 0;
> int i;
>
> if (mqprio_qopt->qopt.offset[0] != 0 ||
> @@ -6658,9 +6649,8 @@ static int i40e_validate_mqprio_qopt(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> "Invalid min tx rate (greater than 0) specified\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - max_rate = mqprio_qopt->max_rate[i];
> - do_div(max_rate, I40E_BW_MBPS_DIVISOR);
> - sum_max_rate += max_rate;
> + sum_max_rate += div_u64(mqprio_qopt->max_rate[i],
> + I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
>
> if (i >= mqprio_qopt->qopt.num_tc - 1)
> break;
> @@ -6804,18 +6794,14 @@ static int i40e_setup_tc(struct net_device *netdev, void *type_data)
>
> if (pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_TC_MQPRIO) {
> if (vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0]) {
> - u64 max_tx_rate = vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0];
> -
> - do_div(max_tx_rate, I40E_BW_MBPS_DIVISOR);
> + u32 max_tx_rate = div_u64(vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0],
> + I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> ret = i40e_set_bw_limit(vsi, vsi->seid, max_tx_rate);
> if (!ret) {
> - u64 credits = max_tx_rate;
> -
> - do_div(credits, I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> dev_dbg(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
> - "Set tx rate of %llu Mbps (count of 50Mbps %llu) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> + "Set tx rate of %u Mbps (count of 50Mbps %u) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> max_tx_rate,
> - credits,
> + max_tx_rate / I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR,
> vsi->seid);
> } else {
> need_reset = true;
> @@ -9024,15 +9010,12 @@ static int i40e_rebuild_channels(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> return ret;
> }
> if (ch->max_tx_rate) {
> - u64 credits = ch->max_tx_rate;
> -
> if (i40e_set_bw_limit(vsi, ch->seid,
> ch->max_tx_rate))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - do_div(credits, I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> dev_dbg(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
> - "Set tx rate of %llu Mbps (count of 50Mbps %llu) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> + "Set tx rate of %u Mbps (count of 50Mbps %u) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> ch->max_tx_rate,
> ch->max_tx_rate / I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR,
> ch->seid);
> @@ -9314,21 +9297,18 @@ static void i40e_rebuild(struct i40e_pf *pf, bool reinit, bool lock_acquired)
> }
>
> if (vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0]) {
> - u64 max_tx_rate = vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0];
> - u64 credits = 0;
> + u32 max_tx_rate = div_u64(vsi->mqprio_qopt.max_rate[0],
> + I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
>
> - do_div(max_tx_rate, I40E_BW_MBPS_DIVISOR);
> ret = i40e_set_bw_limit(vsi, vsi->seid, max_tx_rate);
> - if (ret)
> + if (!ret)
> + dev_dbg(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
> + "Set tx rate of %u Mbps (count of 50Mbps %u) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> + max_tx_rate,
> + max_tx_rate / I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR,
> + vsi->seid);
> + else
> goto end_unlock;
> -
> - credits = max_tx_rate;
> - do_div(credits, I40E_BW_CREDIT_DIVISOR);
> - dev_dbg(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
> - "Set tx rate of %llu Mbps (count of 50Mbps %llu) for vsi->seid %u\n",
> - max_tx_rate,
> - credits,
> - vsi->seid);
> }
>
> ret = i40e_rebuild_cloud_filters(vsi, vsi->seid);
> --
> 2.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@...osl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists