lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:23:50 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Guy Shattah <sguy@...lanox.com>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/map_contig: Add mmap(MAP_CONTIG) support

On 10/17/2017 07:20 AM, Guy Shattah wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 17 2017, Guy Shattah wrote:
>>> Are you going to be OK with kernel API which implements contiguous
>>> memory allocation?  Possibly with mmap style?  Many drivers could
>>> utilize it instead of having their own weird and possibly non-standard
>>> way to allocate contiguous memory.  Such API won't be available for
>>> user space.
>>
>> What you describe sounds like CMA.  It may be far from perfect but it’s there
>> already and drivers which need contiguous memory can allocate it.
>>
> 
> 1. CMA has to preconfigured. We're suggesting mechanism that works 'out of the box'
> 2. Due to the pre-allocation techniques CMA imposes limitation on maximum 
>    allocated memory. RDMA users often require 1Gb or more, sometimes more.
> 3. CMA reserves memory in advance, our suggestion is using existing kernel memory
>      mechanisms (THP for example) to allocate memory. 

I would not totally rule out the use of CMA.  I like the way that it reserves
memory, but does not prohibit use by others.  In addition, there can be
device (or purpose) specific reservations.

However, since reservations need to happen quite early it is often done on
the kernel command line.  IMO, this should be avoided if possible.  There
are interfaces for arch specific code to make reservations.  I do not know
the system initialization sequence well enough to know if it would be
possible for driver code to make CMA reservations.  But, it looks doubtful.

-- 
Mike Kravetz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ