linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] net: ethtool: add SmartNIC reset support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d583bb0-1886-fe56-26c7-a80ba370ef2c@broadcom.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:59:28 -0700
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Allan W. Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@...rosemi.com>,
        Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rosemi.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steve Lin <steven.lin1@...adcom.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] net: ethtool: add SmartNIC reset support

+netdev@...r.kernel.org


On 17-10-18 02:30 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>>
>> On 17-10-18 12:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> Yes, there is also a management processor.
>>> O.K.
>>>
>>> Maybe it would be nice to add some more text to the commit message to
>>> make this clear. Define what an application processor is, and how it
>>> differs from a management processor. But othersize:
>> OK -will add more description to differentiate management processor vs.
>> application processor(s).
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>>>
>>> I assume you have another kernel patch to actually make use of this?
>>> It is normal to post the user of a new API in the same series as the
>>> API.
>> I actually wanted to get agreement that the bit define could be added to
>> ethtool before implementing it in driver.
>> If this direction approved we'll implement in driver and submit with this
>> patch series.
> I just noticed that you did not also post this to netdev@...r.kernel.org.  I
> suspect you are more likely to get review and acceptance if that list is cc'd.
>
> I'm not positive that Linus will take networking patches off this list.
>
>>>       Andrew
>> Thanks,
>>   Scott