linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: gdth: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKG3oHG36mRQ0Wn07nRK=eGW7cV-UEujooA3AVMybndtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:15:19 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: gdth: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Kees,
>
>> Thanks for the reviews! Do you want the timer tree to carry these
>> patches, or can you pick them up in the scsi tree?
>
> Up to you. I'm not going to rebase my 4.15 queue this late in the cycle
> so the patches would end up going in at the end of the merge window. If
> you prefer to have them hit the first pull you should queue them up in
> the timer tree.

Okay, thanks, I'll take them via the timer tree.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security