[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1508339478-26674-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:11:18 +0800
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf util: Fix wrong processing when closing evsel fd
In current xyarray code, xyarray__max_x() returns max_y, and
xyarray__max_y() returns max_x.
It's confusing and for code logic it looks not correct.
Error happens when closing evsel fd. Let's see this scenario:
1. Allocate an fd (pseudo-code)
-------------------------------
perf_evsel__alloc_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
{
evsel->fd = xyarray__new(ncpus, nthreads, sizeof(int));
}
xyarray__new(int xlen, int ylen, size_t entry_size)
{
size_t row_size = ylen * entry_size;
struct xyarray *xy = zalloc(sizeof(*xy) + xlen * row_size);
xy->entry_size = entry_size;
xy->row_size = row_size;
xy->entries = xlen * ylen;
xy->max_x = xlen;
xy->max_y = ylen;
......
}
So max_x is ncpus, max_y is nthreads and row_size = nthreads * 4.
2. Use perf syscall and get the fd
----------------------------------
int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
struct thread_map *threads)
{
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus->nr; cpu++) {
for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
int fd, group_fd;
fd = sys_perf_event_open(&evsel->attr, pid, cpus->map[cpu],
group_fd, flags);
FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = fd;
}
}
static inline void *xyarray__entry(struct xyarray *xy, int x, int y)
{
return &xy->contents[x * xy->row_size + y * xy->entry_size];
}
These codes don't have issues. The issue happens in the closing of fd.
3. Close fd.
-----------
void perf_evsel__close_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
{
int cpu, thread;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < xyarray__max_x(evsel->fd); cpu++)
for (thread = 0; thread < xyarray__max_y(evsel->fd); ++thread) {
close(FD(evsel, cpu, thread));
FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = -1;
}
}
Since xyarray__max_x() returns max_y (nthreads) and xyarry__max_y()
returns max_x (ncpus), so above code is actually to be:
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nthreads; cpu++)
for (thread = 0; thread < ncpus; ++thread) {
close(FD(evsel, cpu, thread));
FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = -1;
}
It's not correct!
This change is introduced by "475fb533fb7d"
("perf evsel: Fix buffer overflow while freeing events")
This fix is to let xyarray__max_x() return max_x (ncpus) and
let xyarry__max_y() return max_y (nthreads)
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/xyarray.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/xyarray.h b/tools/perf/util/xyarray.h
index 4ba726c..54af6046 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/xyarray.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/xyarray.h
@@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ static inline void *xyarray__entry(struct xyarray *xy, int x, int y)
static inline int xyarray__max_y(struct xyarray *xy)
{
- return xy->max_x;
+ return xy->max_y;
}
static inline int xyarray__max_x(struct xyarray *xy)
{
- return xy->max_y;
+ return xy->max_x;
}
#endif /* _PERF_XYARRAY_H_ */
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists