linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] irq-sim updates for 4.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdpKv7t+rHXh5fP8ZL_Q2pOfqJTB4M44Q354AWaBRdU-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:34:21 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] irq-sim updates for 4.15

2017-10-05 14:44 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>:
> I initially submitted patch 2/3 as a standalone, but it turned out
> during some development for iio that some additional functionalities
> would be useful as well.
>
> The first patch pulls in slab.h directly instead of relying on the
> include from irq.h.
>
> The second exposes an interface for accessing the base of the
> allocated interrupt range.
>
> The third implements a function that allows to map the allocated
> interrupt number to the array offset within the irq sim object. This
> will be later (4.16) used in iio, where for 4.15 we needed to keep the
> irq base value and to calculate the offset manually in the driver.
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
>   irq/irq_sim: explicitly pull in slab.h
>   irq/irq_sim: implement irq_sim_baseirq()
>   irq/irq_sim: implement irq_sim_irq2offset()
>
>  include/linux/irq_sim.h |  2 ++
>  kernel/irq/irq_sim.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.13.2
>

Hi Thomas, Marc,

can these be merged or are there any issues with the series?

Thanks,
Bartosz