[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508318326.6806.1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 02:18:46 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.comg>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Kenneth Goldman <kgold@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 11:00 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The printk removals do change the objects.
> >
> > The value of that type of change is only for resource limited systems.
>
> I imagine that such small code adjustments are also useful for other systems.
Your imagination and mine differ.
Where do you _think_ it matters?
For instance, nothing about
sizeof(type)
vs
sizeof(*ptr)
makes it easier for a human to read the code.
This class of change now require a syntactic parser
to find instances of the use of type where previously
a grep or equivalent tool worked well.
> > Markus' changelogs leave much to be desired.
>
> Would you like to help more to improve the provided information
> for the shown change patterns?
I've done that for you far too many times already.
Your changelogs need to detail _why_ something is being
done, not describe any tool used to perform or find a
particular instance of any change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists