linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: axp20x: Simplify axp20x_is_polyphase_slave implementation" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:12:19 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: axp20x: Simplify axp20x_is_polyphase_slave implementation" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: axp20x: Simplify axp20x_is_polyphase_slave implementation

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From ad92ceaf35822ebc2643d65ebba92d6dff18ae33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:03:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: Simplify axp20x_is_polyphase_slave
 implementation

The code to handle AXP803_ID and AXP813_ID cases are exactly the same.
Make the switch-case fall through to avoid duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
index e1761df4cbfd..181622b2813d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
@@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ static bool axp20x_is_polyphase_slave(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x, int id)
 	 */
 	switch (axp20x->variant) {
 	case AXP803_ID:
+	case AXP813_ID:
 		regmap_read(axp20x->regmap, AXP803_POLYPHASE_CTRL, &reg);

 		switch (id) {
@@ -681,17 +682,6 @@ static bool axp20x_is_polyphase_slave(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x, int id)
 		}
 		break;

-	case AXP813_ID:
-		regmap_read(axp20x->regmap, AXP803_POLYPHASE_CTRL, &reg);
-
-		switch (id) {
-		case AXP803_DCDC3:
-			return !!(reg & BIT(6));
-		case AXP803_DCDC6:
-			return !!(reg & BIT(5));
-		}
-		break;
-
 	default:
 		return false;
 	}
-- 
2.14.1