[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +0800
From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC: <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>, <james.morse@....com>,
<will.deacon@....com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<robert.moore@...el.com>, <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
<mingo@...nel.org>, <punit.agrawal@....com>,
<stephen.boyd@...aro.org>, <kamensky@...co.com>,
<prarit@...hat.com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...ica.org>, Wuquanming <wuquanming@...wei.com>,
Huangshaoyu <huangshaoyu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for
SEA/NMI notification type
On 2017/10/18 18:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:04:28AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> ARM does not have ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI notification, which should only
>> used by x86. In the code, I see those guards are never used.
> Yeah, I see it now.
Borislav/Rafael,
For this patch(the first one), whether it can be firstly applied?
This patch is code clean and not related with the second one.
For the second, I may discuss more with James.
Thanks so much in advance.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists