lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:00:53 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v5 31/31] KVM: X86: Restart the guest when insn_len is zero and SEV is enabled On 18/10/2017 14:19, Brijesh Singh wrote: >> Is it needed to test mem_enc_enabled? Could it instead test for the >> availability of decode assists? > > We can use X86_FEATURE_DECODEASSIST but since mmu.c is common file hence > I was not sure if its safe for the VMX. Is it okay to use decode assist > feature bit in mm.c ? See the follow up email. :) Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists