[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508336995.2923.2.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:29:56 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"byungchul.park@....com" <byungchul.park@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"amir73il@...il.com" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"johannes.berg@...el.com" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"kernel-team@....com" <kernel-team@....com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: Fix false positive by LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 18:38 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Several false positives were reported, so I tried to fix them.
>
> It would be appreciated if you tell me if it works as expected, or let
> me know your opinion.
What I have been wondering about is whether the crosslock checking makes
sense from a conceptual point of view. I tried to find documentation for the
crosslock checking in Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt but
couldn't find a description of the crosslock checking. Shouldn't it be
documented somewhere what the crosslock checks do and what the theory is
behind these checks?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists