linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: remove dead igafb driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:45:31 +0200
From:   Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        bhumirks@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: remove dead igafb driver

On Wednesday 18 October 2017, David Miller wrote:
> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:14:27 +0200
>
> > Hi Bartlomiej!
> >
> > On 10/18/2017 02:56 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >> igafb driver hasn't compiled since at least kernel v2.6.34 as
> >> commit 6016a363f6b5 ("of: unify phandle name in struct device_node")
> >> missed updating igafb.c to use dp->phandle instead of dp->node.
> >
> > Would it take a lot of work to port the driver to the new interface?
> >
> > I'm not sure which SPARC machines use this particular framebuffer, but
> > my plans are to fix up all these old framebuffer drivers. I have
> > already
> > received several Amiga (Zorro) graphics cards for testing the updated
> > drivers on Amiga.
> >
> > It could be that I actually have this particular SPARC framebuffer in
> > my hardware collection.
>
> Unless you have a 32-bit sparc laptop, you don't have a machine that
> will use this driver.

There are also some x86 PCI cards using this chip.

-- 
Ondrej Zary