[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171018154436.kyy6nbfn2qfm6dzq@linux-n805>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:44:36 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/6] fs/epoll: scale nested callbacks
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Jason Baron wrote:
>If there are not many EPOLL_CTL_ADDs, then I wouldn't think loop_ncalls
>would be highly contented (since it should only be called from the add
>path)?
So yeah it's all about the readywalks.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists