lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:23:22 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, mhocko@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        x86@...nel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        willy@...radead.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, sam@...nborg.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, steven.sistare@...cle.com,
        daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, bob.picco@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 08/11] arm64/kasan: add and use kasan_map_populate()

Hi Andrew and Michal,

There are a few changes I need to do to my series:

1. Replace these two patches:

arm64/kasan: add and use kasan_map_populate()
x86/kasan: add and use kasan_map_populate()

With:

x86/mm/kasan: don't use vmemmap_populate() to initialize
  shadow
arm64/mm/kasan: don't use vmemmap_populate() to initialize
  shadow

2. Fix a kbuild warning about section mismatch in
mm: deferred_init_memmap improvements

How should I proceed to get these replaced in mm-tree? Send three new 
patches, or send a new series?

Thank you,
Pavel

On 10/18/2017 01:18 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 08:08 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>>
>>> As I said, I'm fine either way, I just didn't want to cause extra work
>>> or rebasing:
>>>
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-October/535703.html
>>
>> Makes sense. I am also fine either way, I can submit a new patch merging together the two if needed.
>>
> 
> Please, do this. Single patch makes more sense
> 
> 
>> Pavel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists