[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019032542.20915.96572.stgit@gimli.home>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:26:58 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jroedel@...e.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Fix alloc_irq_index() increment
On an is_allocated() interrupt index, we ALIGN() the current index and
then increment it via the for loop, guaranteeing that it is no longer
aligned for alignments >1. We instead need to align the next index,
to guarantee forward progress, moving the increment-only to the case
where the index was found to be unallocated.
Fixes: 37946d95fc1a ('iommu/amd: Add align parameter to alloc_irq_index()')
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 9dc7facfd2e5..3c1a29104f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -3682,13 +3682,12 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
/* Scan table for free entries */
for (index = ALIGN(table->min_index, alignment), c = 0;
- index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;
- index++) {
+ index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;) {
if (!iommu->irte_ops->is_allocated(table, index)) {
c += 1;
} else {
c = 0;
- index = ALIGN(index, alignment);
+ index = ALIGN(index + 1, alignment);
continue;
}
@@ -3699,6 +3698,8 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
index -= count - 1;
goto out;
}
+
+ index++;
}
index = -ENOSPC;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists