[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508455438.4542.4.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:24:00 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"byungchul.park@....com" <byungchul.park@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"amir73il@...il.com" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"johannes.berg@...el.com" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"kernel-team@....com" <kernel-team@....com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] completion: Add support for initializing
completion with lockdep_map
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 18:38 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Sometimes, we want to initialize completions with sparate lockdep maps
> to assign lock classes under control. For example, the workqueue code
> manages lockdep maps, as it can classify lockdep maps properly.
> Provided a function for that purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/completion.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/completion.h b/include/linux/completion.h
> index cae5400..182d56e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/completion.h
> +++ b/include/linux/completion.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ static inline void complete_release_commit(struct completion *x)
> lock_commit_crosslock((struct lockdep_map *)&x->map);
> }
>
> +#define init_completion_with_map(x, m) \
> +do { \
> + lockdep_init_map_crosslock((struct lockdep_map *)&(x)->map, \
> + (m)->name, (m)->key, 0); \
> + __init_completion(x); \
> +} while (0)
Are there any completion objects for which the cross-release checking is
useful? Are there any wait_for_completion() callers that hold a mutex or
other locking object?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists