linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [media] rc/keymaps: add support for two RCs of hisilicon boards.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:21:55 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>, mchehab@...nel.org
Cc:     hermit.wangheming@...ilicon.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [media] rc/keymaps: add support for two RCs of
 hisilicon boards.

On 10/19/2017 09:12 AM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> Hi Hans，
> 
> On 2017/10/19 15:01, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 10/18/2017 12:54 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>>> Add support for two remote controllers of hisilicon boards.
>>>
>>> Younian Wang (2):
>>>   [media] rc/keymaps: add support for RC of hisilicon TV demo boards
>>>   [media] rc/keymaps: add support for RC of hisilicon poplar board
>>>
>>>  drivers/media/rc/keymaps/Makefile          |  2 +
>>>  drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-hisi-poplar.c  | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-hisi-tv-demo.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-hisi-poplar.c
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-hisi-tv-demo.c
>>>
>>
>> Did you make a mistake? You reposted these two patches, but still without any
>> copyright statement...
>>
>> I think something went wrong here.
>>
> I haven't reposted them so far. This is still the first version. I am waiting
> to see if there are any more comments. If not, I can repost them soon.

Ah, now I see why I got confused: something is wrong with the email dates: Sean's
reply has an earlier timestamp than your patch series. So I mistakenly thought
that the patch series was a v2 series.

Regards,

	Hans