lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019073418.GC20787@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:34:18 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, k.lewandowsk@...sung.com,
        l.stelmach@...sung.com, p.szewczyk@...sung.com,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, andrzej.p@...sung.com,
        kopasiak90@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4][PoC][RFC] sched: Allow to get() and put() signal
 struct

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:32:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> Allow to get() and put() signal struct from different
> parts of kernel core, not only from signal.c.

That says what this does, but not _why_.  Who would ever want to have
access to these internal-only functions?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ