[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fuafio5d.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:37:34 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb tree
Hi,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/snps_udc_core.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 29bce57723351f63d ("usb/gadget/snps_udc_core: Convert timers to use timer_setup()")
>>
>> from the usb tree and commit:
>>
>> 46b614affda8667f9 ("usb: gadget: udc: snps_udc_core: use setup_timer() helper.")
>>
>> from the usb-gadget tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up by taking the USB version and can carry the fix as
>> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
>> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
>> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
>> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
>> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> FWIW, timer_setup() should be preferred over setup_timer().
I'll drop the one from my tree.
thanks
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists