linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] livepatch callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1710191013430.9294@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:14:36 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
cc:     live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] livepatch callbacks

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Joe Lawrence wrote:

> Another turn of the livepatch callback crank.  This version cleans up
> some minor issues found in v5 and was rebased on top of Jiri's branches
> listed below.
> 
> Unfortunately, I didn't have time to test out Petr's suggestion to move
> the pre-patch callback inside klp_patch_object() and the post-unpatch
> callback into klp_unpatch_object()... let me know if this is a
> deal-breaker (I think it would be possible to revisit this later if
> need be.)
> 
> Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions thus far!

Applied to for-4.15/callbacks branch, thanks a lot.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs