[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019092919.GA7252@Asurada>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 02:29:20 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: thierry.reding@...il.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
pdeschrijver@...dia.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: tegra: Use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic in
tegra210_clock_init
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:10:13PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Below is the call trace of tegra210_init_pllu() function:
> start_kernel()
> -> time_init()
> --> of_clk_init()
> ---> tegra210_clock_init()
> ----> tegra210_pll_init()
> -----> tegra210_init_pllu()
>
> Because the preemption is disabled in the start_kernel before calling
> time_init, tegra210_init_pllu is actually in an atomic context while
> it includes a readl_relaxed_poll_timeout that might sleep.
>
> So this patch just changes this readl_relaxed_poll_timeout() to its
> atomic version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Thierry, can you also take a look at this one? I sent a month ago. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists