lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019115104.GR21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:51:05 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix timestamps beyond 2027

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> isofs uses a 'char' variable to load the number of years since
> 1900 for an inode timestamp. On architectures that use a signed
> char type by default, this results in an invalid date for
> anything beyond 2027.
> 
> This adds a cast to 'u8' for the year number, which should extend
> the shelf life of the file system until 2155.
> 
> This should be backported to all kernels that might still be
> in use by that date.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  fs/isofs/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/isofs/util.c b/fs/isofs/util.c
> index 005a15cfd30a..f40796c4c6c2 100644
> --- a/fs/isofs/util.c
> +++ b/fs/isofs/util.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int iso_date(char * p, int flag)
>  	int year, month, day, hour, minute, second, tz;
>  	int crtime;
>  
> -	year = p[0];
> +	year = (int)(u8)p[0];

This is BS; just turn that
        char time[7];
in struct stamp into
	unsigned char time[7];
and adjust iso_date() accordingly.  Or make that
sucker actually take struct stamp *, while we are at it.

And I'd suggest going through the rest of on-disk structures in
rock.h and looking for other trouble of that sort.  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ