lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019125552.GB20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:55:52 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Abbott Liu <liuwenliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, labbott@...hat.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...e.com, cdall@...aro.org,
        marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, thgarnie@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        arnd@...db.de, vladimir.murzin@....com, tixy@...aro.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, robin.murphy@....com, mingo@...nel.org,
        grygorii.strashko@...aro.org, glider@...gle.com,
        dvyukov@...gle.com, opendmb@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        jiazhenghua@...wei.com, dylix.dailei@...wei.com,
        zengweilin@...wei.com, heshaoliang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] Don't need to map the shadow of KASan's shadow
 memory

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:22:25PM +0800, Abbott Liu wrote:
>  Because the KASan's shadow memory don't need to track,so remove the
>  mapping code in kasan_init.

Is there a reason why this isn't part of the earlier patch that
introduced the code below?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ