[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171019134842.325475341@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:48:37 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 16/51] f2fs: do SSR for data when there is enough free space
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 035e97adab26c1121cedaeb9bd04cf48a8e8cf51 ]
In allocate_segment_by_default(), need_SSR() already detected it's time to do
SSR. So, let's try to find victims for data segments more aggressively in time.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_s
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
const struct victim_selection *v_ops = DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops;
- if (IS_NODESEG(type) || !has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0))
+ if (IS_NODESEG(type))
return v_ops->get_victim(sbi,
&(curseg)->next_segno, BG_GC, type, SSR);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists