[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171019134844.802909262@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:49:10 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 04/27] sctp: potential read out of bounds in sctp_ulpevent_type_enabled()
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
[ Upstream commit fa5f7b51fc3080c2b195fa87c7eca7c05e56f673 ]
This code causes a static checker warning because Smatch doesn't trust
anything that comes from skb->data. I've reviewed this code and I do
think skb->data can be controlled by the user here.
The sctp_event_subscribe struct has 13 __u8 fields and we want to see
if ours is non-zero. sn_type can be any value in the 0-USHRT_MAX range.
We're subtracting SCTP_SN_TYPE_BASE which is 1 << 15 so we could read
either before the start of the struct or after the end.
This is a very old bug and it's surprising that it would go undetected
for so long but my theory is that it just doesn't have a big impact so
it would be hard to notice.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h
@@ -141,8 +141,12 @@ __u16 sctp_ulpevent_get_notification_typ
static inline int sctp_ulpevent_type_enabled(__u16 sn_type,
struct sctp_event_subscribe *mask)
{
+ int offset = sn_type - SCTP_SN_TYPE_BASE;
char *amask = (char *) mask;
- return amask[sn_type - SCTP_SN_TYPE_BASE];
+
+ if (offset >= sizeof(struct sctp_event_subscribe))
+ return 0;
+ return amask[offset];
}
/* Given an event subscription, is this event enabled? */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists